11 messages
Discussions related to GitHub Actions
rssover 1 year ago(edited)
GitHub Actions: arm64 Linux and Windows runners are now generally available
GitHub Actions: arm64 Linux and Windows runners are now generally available
The post GitHub Actions: arm64 Linux and Windows runners are now generally available appeared first on The GitHub Blog.
GitHub Actions: arm64 Linux and Windows runners are now generally available
The post GitHub Actions: arm64 Linux and Windows runners are now generally available appeared first on The GitHub Blog.
jaysunover 1 year ago
does anyone if it’s possible to use github oidc for auth in GHA for argocd diffs?
there a bunch of examples of people accomplishing this with static creds (api token generated in argo), but would love to take it one step further with modernized auth / security best practices. would it be possible using
https://github.com/argocd-diff-action/argocd-diff-action
there a bunch of examples of people accomplishing this with static creds (api token generated in argo), but would love to take it one step further with modernized auth / security best practices. would it be possible using
oidc.config with a github app?https://github.com/argocd-diff-action/argocd-diff-action
Igor Mover 1 year ago
Hey folks! I have experience with GitLab CI but considering using GitHub Actions for my new gig. There are a couple of things I really liked about GitLab and I'm curious how GHA stacks up.
1. You can provision multiple GitLab runner management pods with different SAs and settings (for example, nodegroup affinity to determine which nodes actual runners need to run on and resource requests that can be overriden in pipeline config via env vars). The management pods then listen for new jobs and spin up pods to execute as required with necessary settings. This is very convenient as you can easily set up new pods with AWS permissions and run them on Karpenter nodes of your choosing. Does the Github Actions runner controller offer similar flexibility?
2. It seems that Github Actions CI is free to run on Self-hosted runners, but just wanted to confirm that there are no hidden costs anywhere
3. GitLab runner pods had "service" containers which supported running docker-in-docker if needed. Can you do docker-in-docker in GHA?
4. For those familiar with both GitLab CI and GHA, any other "limitations" in GHA I should be aware of?
1. You can provision multiple GitLab runner management pods with different SAs and settings (for example, nodegroup affinity to determine which nodes actual runners need to run on and resource requests that can be overriden in pipeline config via env vars). The management pods then listen for new jobs and spin up pods to execute as required with necessary settings. This is very convenient as you can easily set up new pods with AWS permissions and run them on Karpenter nodes of your choosing. Does the Github Actions runner controller offer similar flexibility?
2. It seems that Github Actions CI is free to run on Self-hosted runners, but just wanted to confirm that there are no hidden costs anywhere
3. GitLab runner pods had "service" containers which supported running docker-in-docker if needed. Can you do docker-in-docker in GHA?
4. For those familiar with both GitLab CI and GHA, any other "limitations" in GHA I should be aware of?
RBover 1 year ago
I noticed there is no convention posted for github action input/output naming conventions. Does cloudposse have a documented standard?
• https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/39547
• https://github.com/rhysd/actionlint/issues/450
• https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/39547
• https://github.com/rhysd/actionlint/issues/450
rssover 1 year ago(edited)
Notice of upcoming deprecations and changes in GitHub Actions services
Notice of upcoming deprecations and changes in GitHub Actions services
The post Notice of upcoming deprecations and changes in GitHub Actions services appeared first on The GitHub Blog.
Notice of upcoming deprecations and changes in GitHub Actions services
The post Notice of upcoming deprecations and changes in GitHub Actions services appeared first on The GitHub Blog.
Igor Mover 1 year ago
I don't see a serviceAccount under runner spec for https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-components/blob/main/modules/eks/github-actions-runner. Would that not be how you'd associate IAM permission to the runner scale set?
Dhamodharanover 1 year ago
Any suggestions on this?
RBover 1 year ago
The ultimate goal of this App is to wholly eliminate the need for GitHub Personal Access Tokens (aka PATs).
The original blog post.
https://github.com/octo-sts/app by chainguard
rssover 1 year ago(edited)
End of life for Actions Node16
End of life for Actions Node16
The post End of life for Actions Node16 appeared first on The GitHub Blog.
End of life for Actions Node16
The post End of life for Actions Node16 appeared first on The GitHub Blog.
rssover 1 year ago(edited)
Actions: new images and ubuntu-latest changes
Actions: new images and ubuntu-latest changes
The post Actions: new images and ubuntu-latest changes appeared first on The GitHub Blog.
Actions: new images and ubuntu-latest changes
The post Actions: new images and ubuntu-latest changes appeared first on The GitHub Blog.
rssover 1 year ago(edited)
Introducing “CI/CD Admin” – A New Pre-Defined Organization Role for GitHub Actions
Introducing "CI/CD Admin" - A New Pre-Defined Organization Role for GitHub Actions
The post Introducing “CI/CD Admin” – A New Pre-Defined Organization Role for GitHub Actions appeared first on The GitHub Blog.
Introducing "CI/CD Admin" - A New Pre-Defined Organization Role for GitHub Actions
The post Introducing “CI/CD Admin” – A New Pre-Defined Organization Role for GitHub Actions appeared first on The GitHub Blog.