#atmos-dev - May 2025 | Slack Archive

10 messages

Discuss atmos core development (golang). If you want to help out, reach out to @Erik Osterman (Cloud Posse)

Apr 2025

May 2025

Jun 2025

Shubham Tholiya11 months ago

add pager to describe config command by samtholiya · Pull Request #1203 · cloudposse/atmos
We are fine with reviewing this as well
@Erik Osterman (Cloud Posse)

Dan Hansen11 months ago

It seems like I can't store complex types (like maps) using the GSM Store. It raises ErrValueMustBeString while the other stores allow it by marshalling to/from json.
I think I could implement this, but it'd be a breaking change 🤔

Andriy Knysh (Cloud Posse)11 months ago

@Haitham please take a look and fix the folowwing test:

Vinny11 months ago

Good morning can someone check https://github.com/cloudposse/atmos/pull/1228 , and https://github.com/cloudposse/atmos/pull/1219 that should be simple to merge

Vinny11 months ago

@Dan Miller (Cloud Posse) would appreciate if you have time to check again https://github.com/cloudposse/atmos/pull/1180

Shubham Tholiya11 months ago(edited)

Hi @Dan Miller (Cloud Posse) @Ben Smith (Cloud Posse)
Can someone of you check my pr's:

Grew a lot because of the time it remained as a pr:
https://github.com/cloudposse/atmos/pull/1174

Pager pr's:
https://github.com/cloudposse/atmos/pull/1203
https://github.com/cloudposse/atmos/pull/1215
https://github.com/cloudposse/atmos/pull/1236 (~~after update test failed so fixing it now~~)

no color pr's:
https://github.com/cloudposse/atmos/pull/1227

Charles11 months ago

Was this PR abandoned? Add Azure Key Vault support for Atmos Stores by jamengual · Pull Request #963 · cloudposse/atmos

@PePe Amengual: I would really like to see key vault support be added to atmos.

PePe Amengual11 months ago(edited)

is not abandoned, I just did not have time this week to finish it and the bot suspended it

Dan Miller (Cloud Posse)11 months ago

@Vinny, I'm working on another list feature, and I heard that you've also worked on improving the look and feel with list stacks and list components. Do you have a PR I could review?

Shubham Tholiya10 months ago(edited)

Let us review these two prs in the same order as i mentioned bellow.
note: I stacked the pr, just to avoid rework or waiting for the pr to get merged to main. So 3182 should be merged first then 3221 will automatically target main.

Ofcourse review could be independent.
Feature/dev 3182 add pager to atmos describe affected command by samtholiya · Pull Request #1255 · cloudposse/atmos
Feature/dev 3221 add pager to atmos describe stack command by samtholiya · Pull Request #1265 · cloudposse/atmos
add pager to describe workflow by samtholiya · Pull Request #1266 · cloudposse/atmos

April 2025 Browse by date June 2025